Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Pick a question we already ask

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

Or write your own question Your answer options (comma-separated, 2–6)

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Age band

Gender

Education

Household income

Marital status

Household size

K-12 children in household

Housing

Location type

Employment

Voting consistency

Voice tier

Forum engagement

State

County

Party identification (pick one or more)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

Sample size (simulated completes)

Demographic options to show OPTION 1 — Basic Demographics OPTION 2 — Bundle A — Household & Family OPTION 3 — Bundle B — Economic Profile OPTION 4 — Bundle C — Civic Participation OPTION 5 — Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions

Re-run with a new sample Download CSV

SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 52.6% — a clear, decisive leader (16.4 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment) Segment leaderboard (sortable) Geography (state & county) Raw table + CSV export

Disagree — 11.2% (112)

Undecided / Depends on details — 36.2% (362)

Agree — 52.6% (526)

AI-Powered Breakdown generated from this exact response set

Computed live from the 1,000 simulated completes — no model call, no delay.

What drives the leader

Party identification: Strong Democrat (n=110) 0% (-52.6 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Democrat (n=79) 5.1% (-47.5 pts)

Party identification: Strong Republican (n=162) 100% (+47.4 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Republican (n=129) 92.2% (+39.6 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Democratic (n=92) 17.4% (-35.2 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Republican (n=117) 74.4% (+21.8 pts)

Where the leader is weakest

Party identification: Strong Democrat (n=110) 0% (-52.6 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Democrat (n=79) 5.1% (-47.5 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Democratic (n=92) 17.4% (-35.2 pts)

Location type: In city limits (n=155) 32.9% (-19.7 pts)

Age band: 18-24 (n=107) 34.6% (-18 pts)

Read-out

Lead with the Strong Republican block (party_lean): 100% back “Agree”, +47.4pt above the 52.6% average on n=162.
Do not open there: Strong Democrat (party_lean) runs -52.6pt under the average — 0% on n=110.
Geographic concentration: Kent County carries 2.4% of the sample at 62.5% on the lead answer.
Fielding cost of this cut: $0 · instant. A traditional panel would need 1,000 completes at ~$2–$6 each.
Answer spread (HHI) 0.42 — a real two-way contest.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band

45-54 — 48.3% (n=178)

65-74 — 65.3% (n=144)

25-34 — 42.9% (n=177)

55-64 — 68.3% (n=161)

75+ — 61.5% (n=96)

18-24 — 34.6% (n=107)

35-44 — 46.7% (n=137)

Gender

Female — 51.2% (n=498)

Male — 53.8% (n=476)

Non-binary — 42.9% (n=14)

Prefer not to say — 75% (n=12)

Party identification

Strong Democrat — 0% (n=110)

Independent / Leaning Republican — 74.4% (n=117)

True Independent / Moderate / Other — 44.4% (n=311)

Strong Republican — 100% (n=162)

Not-so-strong Republican — 92.2% (n=129)

Not-so-strong Democrat — 5.1% (n=79)

Independent / Leaning Democratic — 17.4% (n=92)

Registered voter status

1 — 52.3% (n=914)

0 — 55.8% (n=86)

State

VT — 51.5% (n=68)

DE — 42.1% (n=19)

FL — 50% (n=34)

CT — 55% (n=20)

ME — 49.2% (n=65)

UT — 48.3% (n=60)

NV — 50.8% (n=63)

ND — 52% (n=50)

NM — 63.2% (n=38)

PA — 57.5% (n=40)

WV — 33.3% (n=24)

WY — 58.3% (n=48)

AZ — 68.3% (n=41)

MA — 41.7% (n=36)

AR — 60% (n=30)

NH — 48.4% (n=62)

AK — 41.7% (n=24)

LA — 71.4% (n=14)

RI — 56.1% (n=57)

OK — 50% (n=6)

KS — 20% (n=5)

MT — 55.6% (n=18)

NE — 57.1% (n=7)

ID — 33.3% (n=6)

DC — 66.7% (n=9)

SC — 51.9% (n=54)

OR — 50% (n=32)

NJ — 50% (n=22)

MS — 42.9% (n=7)

HI — 68.8% (n=16)

Voting consistency

Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 48.6% (n=282)

Every single election (Primary & General) — 57.3% (n=422)

Rarely vote — 48.2% (n=85)

Only in major Presidential elections — 48.9% (n=180)

First-time participant (Future Voter) — 58.1% (n=31)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance

5 — 56.4% (n=716)

6 — 91.7% (n=84)

4 — 22.5% (n=200)

Public safety funding stance

3 — 3.4% (n=59)

4 — 33.8% (n=468)

5 — 76.6% (n=457)

6 — 100% (n=16)

School funding / choice stance

4 — 37.9% (n=467)

5 — 79.9% (n=374)

6 — 100% (n=49)

3 — 0.9% (n=110)

Regulation & business stance

3 — 5.6% (n=179)

4 — 40.9% (n=416)

5 — 84.8% (n=348)

6 — 100% (n=51)

2 — 0% (n=6)

Federal economy stance

3 — 4.1% (n=194)

4 — 47.3% (n=491)

5 — 91.9% (n=298)

6 — 100% (n=12)

2 — 0% (n=5)

Abortion stance

3 — 0% (n=125)

6 — 96.4% (n=195)

5 — 67.9% (n=380)

4 — 24.5% (n=290)

7 — 100% (n=9)

Property-tax cap debate

0 — 0% (n=362)

1 — 100% (n=427)

2 — 100% (n=99)

-1 — 0% (n=110)

Parental-notification debate

-2 — 0% (n=26)

0 — 44.5% (n=407)

1 — 82.6% (n=316)

2 — 98.6% (n=69)

-1 — 8.8% (n=182)

Biological sex in sports debate

-2 — 0% (n=45)

0 — 43.5% (n=393)

2 — 100% (n=72)

1 — 89.1% (n=303)

-1 — 7% (n=187)

Single-sex spaces debate

-1 — 5.3% (n=189)

1 — 86.9% (n=320)

0 — 40.7% (n=391)

2 — 100% (n=79)

-2 — 0% (n=21)

Policing vs. community safety debate

-1 — 7.7% (n=195)

0 — 44.1% (n=424)

1 — 86.6% (n=343)

-2 — 0% (n=11)

2 — 100% (n=27)

Senate/SCOTUS reform debate

-1 — 5.5% (n=181)

0 — 43.2% (n=498)

1 — 94.1% (n=304)

2 — 100% (n=15)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.