Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Pick a question we already ask

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

Or write your own question Your answer options (comma-separated, 2–6)

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Age band

Gender

Education

Household income

Marital status

Household size

K-12 children in household

Housing

Location type

Employment

Voting consistency

Voice tier

Forum engagement

State

County

Party identification (pick one or more)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

Sample size (simulated completes)

Demographic options to show OPTION 1 — Basic Demographics OPTION 2 — Bundle A — Household & Family OPTION 3 — Bundle B — Economic Profile OPTION 4 — Bundle C — Civic Participation OPTION 5 — Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions

Re-run with a new sample Download CSV

SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 49% — a solid but not commanding lead (10.8 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment) Segment leaderboard (sortable) Geography (state & county) Raw table + CSV export

Disagree — 12.8% (128)

Undecided / Depends on details — 38.2% (382)

Agree — 49% (490)

AI-Powered Breakdown generated from this exact response set

Computed live from the 1,000 simulated completes — no model call, no delay.

What drives the leader

Party identification: Strong Republican (n=156) 99.4% (+50.4 pts)

Party identification: Strong Democrat (n=126) 0% (-49 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Democrat (n=85) 2.4% (-46.6 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Republican (n=117) 88.9% (+39.9 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Democratic (n=85) 9.4% (-39.6 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Republican (n=105) 83.8% (+34.8 pts)

Where the leader is weakest

Party identification: Strong Democrat (n=126) 0% (-49 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Democrat (n=85) 2.4% (-46.6 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Democratic (n=85) 9.4% (-39.6 pts)

Location type: Downtown (n=74) 31.1% (-17.9 pts)

Location type: In city limits (n=158) 31.6% (-17.4 pts)

Read-out

Lead with the Strong Republican block (party_lean): 99.4% back “Agree”, +50.4pt above the 49% average on n=156.
Do not open there: Strong Democrat (party_lean) runs -49pt under the average — 0% on n=126.
Geographic concentration: Kent County carries 2.3% of the sample at 65.2% on the lead answer.
Fielding cost of this cut: $0 · instant. A traditional panel would need 1,000 completes at ~$2–$6 each.
Answer spread (HHI) 0.402 — a real two-way contest.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band

25-34 — 40.7% (n=182)

65-74 — 60.2% (n=128)

45-54 — 39.5% (n=162)

35-44 — 42.6% (n=162)

55-64 — 55.8% (n=156)

18-24 — 44.6% (n=112)

75+ — 70.4% (n=98)

Gender

Female — 51.7% (n=518)

Male — 46.4% (n=457)

Prefer not to say — 54.5% (n=11)

Non-binary — 28.6% (n=14)

Party identification

True Independent / Moderate / Other — 40.8% (n=326)

Not-so-strong Democrat — 2.4% (n=85)

Independent / Leaning Republican — 83.8% (n=105)

Independent / Leaning Democratic — 9.4% (n=85)

Strong Republican — 99.4% (n=156)

Strong Democrat — 0% (n=126)

Not-so-strong Republican — 88.9% (n=117)

Registered voter status

1 — 49.6% (n=891)

0 — 44% (n=109)

State

ME — 59% (n=61)

VT — 46.2% (n=65)

AL — 60% (n=10)

MA — 46.9% (n=32)

RI — 58.2% (n=55)

CT — 31.6% (n=19)

NH — 44.1% (n=59)

AZ — 55.6% (n=54)

NV — 40.2% (n=87)

AK — 44.8% (n=29)

ND — 39.5% (n=43)

DC — 36.8% (n=19)

HI — 38.1% (n=21)

DE — 41.2% (n=17)

OR — 48.1% (n=27)

WY — 59.5% (n=37)

UT — 45.5% (n=55)

NM — 50% (n=36)

KS — 80% (n=10)

PA — 70.8% (n=24)

NJ — 41.2% (n=34)

SC — 55.3% (n=47)

MT — 47.8% (n=23)

FL — 51.7% (n=29)

TN — 50% (n=6)

NE — 33.3% (n=9)

WV — 50% (n=16)

ID — 66.7% (n=6)

AR — 52% (n=25)

LA — 41.7% (n=12)

MI — 0% (n=5)

OK — 42.9% (n=7)

MS — 60% (n=5)

Voting consistency

Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 53.4% (n=262)

Every single election (Primary & General) — 49.2% (n=455)

Only in major Presidential elections — 47.7% (n=176)

First-time participant (Future Voter) — 47.6% (n=21)

Rarely vote — 37.2% (n=86)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance

5 — 53.9% (n=713)

4 — 15.8% (n=203)

6 — 88.1% (n=84)

Public safety funding stance

4 — 29.8% (n=516)

3 — 0% (n=55)

5 — 77.3% (n=409)

6 — 100% (n=20)

School funding / choice stance

4 — 33.7% (n=469)

3 — 0.8% (n=133)

5 — 81.3% (n=359)

6 — 100% (n=39)

Regulation & business stance

4 — 38.3% (n=392)

3 — 1.9% (n=216)

5 — 84.9% (n=331)

6 — 100% (n=55)

2 — 0% (n=6)

Federal economy stance

4 — 42.2% (n=486)

3 — 2% (n=205)

5 — 91.8% (n=294)

6 — 100% (n=11)

Abortion stance

5 — 65.1% (n=347)

4 — 20.4% (n=324)

6 — 97.4% (n=192)

3 — 0.8% (n=125)

7 — 100% (n=10)

Property-tax cap debate

1 — 100% (n=399)

-1 — 0% (n=127)

2 — 100% (n=91)

0 — 0% (n=382)

Parental-notification debate

0 — 41.1% (n=431)

-1 — 5.2% (n=192)

1 — 84.5% (n=251)

2 — 96.8% (n=94)

-2 — 0% (n=32)

Biological sex in sports debate

0 — 41.8% (n=407)

1 — 88.1% (n=268)

-1 — 3.2% (n=217)

-2 — 0% (n=31)

2 — 100% (n=77)

Single-sex spaces debate

0 — 39% (n=400)

-1 — 3.2% (n=220)

1 — 87.5% (n=296)

2 — 100% (n=68)

-2 — 0% (n=16)

Policing vs. community safety debate

0 — 44% (n=448)

-1 — 4.2% (n=212)

2 — 100% (n=32)

1 — 85.1% (n=296)

-2 — 0% (n=12)

Senate/SCOTUS reform debate

0 — 41.9% (n=506)

-1 — 4.5% (n=198)

1 — 90.5% (n=273)

2 — 100% (n=22)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.