Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Pick a question we already ask

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

Or write your own question Your answer options (comma-separated, 2–6)

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Age band

Gender

Education

Household income

Marital status

Household size

K-12 children in household

Housing

Location type

Employment

Voting consistency

Voice tier

Forum engagement

State

County

Party identification (pick one or more)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

Sample size (simulated completes)

Demographic options to show OPTION 1 — Basic Demographics OPTION 2 — Bundle A — Household & Family OPTION 3 — Bundle B — Economic Profile OPTION 4 — Bundle C — Civic Participation OPTION 5 — Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions

Re-run with a new sample Download CSV

SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 48.1% — a solid but not commanding lead (9.9 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment) Segment leaderboard (sortable) Geography (state & county) Raw table + CSV export

Disagree — 13.7% (137)

Undecided / Depends on details — 38.2% (382)

Agree — 48.1% (481)

AI-Powered Breakdown generated from this exact response set

Computed live from the 1,000 simulated completes — no model call, no delay.

What drives the leader

Party identification: Strong Republican (n=162) 100% (+51.9 pts)

Party identification: Strong Democrat (n=134) 0% (-48.1 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Democrat (n=106) 4.7% (-43.4 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Republican (n=109) 89.9% (+41.8 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Democratic (n=77) 13% (-35.1 pts)

Location type: Downtown (n=52) 21.2% (-26.9 pts)

Where the leader is weakest

Party identification: Strong Democrat (n=134) 0% (-48.1 pts)

Party identification: Not-so-strong Democrat (n=106) 4.7% (-43.4 pts)

Party identification: Independent / Leaning Democratic (n=77) 13% (-35.1 pts)

Location type: Downtown (n=52) 21.2% (-26.9 pts)

Location type: In city limits (n=162) 30.2% (-17.9 pts)

Read-out

Lead with the Strong Republican block (party_lean): 100% back “Agree”, +51.9pt above the 48.1% average on n=162.
Do not open there: Strong Democrat (party_lean) runs -48.1pt under the average — 0% on n=134.
Geographic concentration: Providence County carries 2.4% of the sample at 50% on the lead answer.
Fielding cost of this cut: $0 · instant. A traditional panel would need 1,000 completes at ~$2–$6 each.
Answer spread (HHI) 0.396 — opinion is fragmented across the options.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band

25-34 — 37.8% (n=188)

65-74 — 61.5% (n=122)

55-64 — 65.2% (n=158)

18-24 — 35.2% (n=105)

75+ — 69.7% (n=99)

45-54 — 39.3% (n=163)

35-44 — 37.6% (n=165)

Gender

Male — 46.9% (n=450)

Female — 49.1% (n=525)

Prefer not to say — 53.8% (n=13)

Non-binary — 41.7% (n=12)

Party identification

Strong Republican — 100% (n=162)

True Independent / Moderate / Other — 40.1% (n=294)

Independent / Leaning Republican — 74.6% (n=118)

Not-so-strong Democrat — 4.7% (n=106)

Not-so-strong Republican — 89.9% (n=109)

Strong Democrat — 0% (n=134)

Independent / Leaning Democratic — 13% (n=77)

Registered voter status

1 — 48.5% (n=889)

0 — 45% (n=111)

State

SC — 61.5% (n=52)

NJ — 57.7% (n=26)

ME — 48% (n=50)

FL — 50% (n=24)

NM — 40% (n=35)

WV — 47.1% (n=17)

VT — 44.1% (n=68)

AK — 56% (n=25)

AZ — 51% (n=49)

UT — 40.3% (n=67)

ND — 55% (n=60)

WY — 44.4% (n=36)

AR — 29.2% (n=24)

DC — 62.5% (n=16)

RI — 49.2% (n=63)

NV — 43.5% (n=62)

NH — 45.8% (n=59)

MA — 46.2% (n=39)

HI — 48.1% (n=27)

KS — 33.3% (n=6)

MI — 37.5% (n=8)

PA — 61.3% (n=31)

OR — 54.1% (n=37)

CT — 57.1% (n=14)

TN — 42.9% (n=7)

DE — 25% (n=24)

LA — 41.7% (n=12)

MT — 26.7% (n=15)

OK — 28.6% (n=7)

ID — 57.1% (n=14)

Voting consistency

Rarely vote — 44% (n=116)

Every single election (Primary & General) — 49.1% (n=379)

Only in major Presidential elections — 47.7% (n=193)

Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 48.9% (n=284)

First-time participant (Future Voter) — 46.4% (n=28)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance

5 — 51.5% (n=713)

4 — 20.1% (n=209)

6 — 92.3% (n=78)

Public safety funding stance

5 — 77.3% (n=392)

4 — 33% (n=518)

3 — 0% (n=83)

6 — 100% (n=7)

School funding / choice stance

5 — 80.1% (n=381)

4 — 31.9% (n=436)

3 — 0.7% (n=147)

6 — 100% (n=36)

Regulation & business stance

5 — 82.1% (n=319)

4 — 39.2% (n=390)

6 — 100% (n=61)

3 — 2.3% (n=222)

2 — 0% (n=8)

Federal economy stance

5 — 91.7% (n=289)

4 — 41.4% (n=466)

3 — 4.4% (n=226)

6 — 100% (n=13)

2 — 0% (n=6)

Abortion stance

6 — 96.9% (n=192)

4 — 20.9% (n=335)

5 — 66.7% (n=330)

3 — 0% (n=134)

7 — 100% (n=5)

Property-tax cap debate

1 — 100% (n=394)

-1 — 0% (n=135)

0 — 0% (n=382)

2 — 100% (n=87)

Parental-notification debate

1 — 79.5% (n=303)

0 — 41% (n=378)

-1 — 5.7% (n=210)

2 — 97.3% (n=75)

-2 — 0% (n=34)

Biological sex in sports debate

1 — 84.4% (n=269)

0 — 43% (n=381)

2 — 100% (n=77)

-1 — 6% (n=218)

-2 — 0% (n=55)

Single-sex spaces debate

2 — 100% (n=61)

0 — 38.1% (n=373)

1 — 85.9% (n=311)

-1 — 4.9% (n=224)

-2 — 0% (n=31)

Policing vs. community safety debate

1 — 83.7% (n=313)

0 — 39.3% (n=417)

-1 — 6.5% (n=214)

2 — 100% (n=41)

-2 — 0% (n=15)

Senate/SCOTUS reform debate

1 — 89.7% (n=292)

0 — 41.1% (n=475)

-1 — 3.3% (n=215)

2 — 100% (n=17)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.