Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Pick a question we already ask

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

Or write your own question Your answer options (comma-separated, 2–6)

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Age band

Gender

Education

Household income

Marital status

Household size

K-12 children in household

Housing

Location type

Employment

Voting consistency

Voice tier

Forum engagement

State

County

Party identification (pick one or more)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

Sample size (simulated completes)

Demographic options to show OPTION 1 — Basic Demographics OPTION 2 — Bundle A — Household & Family OPTION 3 — Bundle B — Economic Profile OPTION 4 — Bundle C — Civic Participation OPTION 5 — Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions

Re-run with a new sample Download CSV

SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 47.2% — a solid but not commanding lead (6.5 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment) Segment leaderboard (sortable) Geography (state & county) Raw table + CSV export

Each row is a segment; each column is one answer. This is the matrix your campaign actually targets — every cell is a real count from the simulated sample.

Segment	Disagree	Undecided / Depends on details	Agree	n
ALL SIMULATED VOTERS	12.1%	40.7%	47.2%	1,000
Age band · 35-44	14.1%	48.8%	37.1%	170
45-54	11.7%	42.1%	46.2%	171
18-24	21.6%	46.4%	32%	125
65-74	8.5%	25.4%	66.2%	142
55-64	2.5%	37%	60.5%	162
25-34	18.5%	44.4%	37.1%	151
75+	7.6%	39.2%	53.2%	79
Gender · Male	13.7%	40.1%	46.2%	476
Female	11%	41.1%	47.9%	501
Non-binary	7.7%	53.8%	38.5%	13
Prefer not to say	0%	30%	70%	10
Party identification · True Independent / Moderate / Other	2.5%	61.8%	35.7%	314
Strong Republican	0%	0.6%	99.4%	163
Independent / Leaning Republican	0%	31.9%	68.1%	135
Not-so-strong Democrat	32.5%	66.3%	1.3%	80
Not-so-strong Republican	0%	10.2%	89.8%	108
Independent / Leaning Democratic	17%	73.9%	9.1%	88
Strong Democrat	64.3%	35.7%	0%	112
Registered voter status · 1	12.2%	41%	46.9%	879
0	11.6%	38.8%	49.6%	121
State · NM	14.3%	51.4%	34.3%	35
NV	9.7%	44.4%	45.8%	72
TN	0%	40%	60%	5
VT	9%	52.2%	38.8%	67
SC	11.8%	39.2%	49%	51
DE	8.7%	43.5%	47.8%	23
PA	13.9%	36.1%	50%	36
NH	8.2%	44.9%	46.9%	49
FL	18.8%	40.6%	40.6%	32
ND	13.2%	37.7%	49.1%	53
AL	0%	40%	60%	5
WV	6.7%	46.7%	46.7%	15
WY	15.8%	39.5%	44.7%	38
UT	11.1%	40.3%	48.6%	72
LA	16.7%	16.7%	66.7%	18
OR	7.1%	46.4%	46.4%	28
AR	14.3%	35.7%	50%	28
NJ	12.5%	45.8%	41.7%	24
MT	13%	34.8%	52.2%	23
MO	12.5%	12.5%	75%	8
RI	10.3%	35.3%	54.4%	68
AZ	14.3%	40%	45.7%	35
CT	26.7%	26.7%	46.7%	15
AK	13.3%	46.7%	40%	30
ID	11.1%	44.4%	44.4%	9
ME	10.7%	50%	39.3%	56
MA	17.9%	25%	57.1%	28
HI	11.8%	35.3%	52.9%	17
SD	0%	40%	60%	5
DC	13.3%	53.3%	33.3%	15
MS	50%	0%	50%	8
MD	0%	40%	60%	5
KS	0%	22.2%	77.8%	9
Voting consistency · Only in major Presidential elections	14.4%	39.9%	45.7%	188
Every single election (Primary & General)	11.4%	40%	48.7%	413
Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential)	10.1%	42.3%	47.6%	286
Rarely vote	17.9%	39.7%	42.3%	78
First-time participant (Future Voter)	11.4%	42.9%	45.7%	35
Infrastructure & roads stance · 5	10.6%	40.6%	48.8%	715
6	0%	14%	86%	93
4	23.4%	54.2%	22.4%	192
Public safety funding stance · 4	16.9%	55.9%	27.2%	522
5	0.5%	22.8%	76.7%	412
3	59.6%	40.4%	0%	52
6	0%	0%	100%	14
School funding / choice stance · 5	0.5%	21.7%	77.7%	368
6	0%	0%	100%	43
4	11.1%	58.7%	30.2%	470
3	56.3%	42.9%	0.8%	119
Regulation & business stance · 4	7.2%	61.2%	31.5%	428
6	0%	1.5%	98.5%	68
5	0.3%	17.7%	82%	327
3	50.6%	48.3%	1.1%	174
Federal economy stance · 4	6.1%	58%	36%	495
5	0%	8.9%	91.1%	302
3	47.3%	48.9%	3.8%	186
2	60%	40%	0%	5
6	0%	0%	100%	12
Abortion stance · 5	0.8%	37.1%	62.1%	383
6	0%	3.7%	96.3%	189
4	15.3%	69.7%	15%	294
3	57.6%	41.6%	0.8%	125
7	0%	0%	100%	7
Property-tax cap debate · 1	0%	0%	100%	366
0	0%	100%	0%	407
2	0%	0%	100%	106
-1	100%	0%	0%	119
Parental-notification debate · 1	0%	20.5%	79.5%	317
2	0%	0%	100%	73
0	7.1%	59.1%	33.7%	406
-1	42.9%	51.4%	5.7%	175
-2	58.6%	41.4%	0%	29
Biological sex in sports debate · 0	5.3%	58%	36.8%	400
1	0%	14.9%	85.1%	295
-1	36.2%	61.4%	2.4%	207
2	0%	0%	100%	69
-2	86.2%	13.8%	0%	29
Single-sex spaces debate · 0	5.8%	60.4%	33.8%	417
2	0%	1.5%	98.5%	67
1	0%	16.1%	83.9%	310
-1	45%	52.4%	2.6%	189
-2	70.6%	29.4%	0%	17
Policing vs. community safety debate · 0	7.3%	55.1%	37.5%	437
1	0.6%	19.2%	80.2%	323
-1	39.5%	53%	7.6%	185
2	0%	2.8%	97.2%	36
-2	73.7%	26.3%	0%	19
Senate/SCOTUS reform debate · 0	6.3%	54.1%	39.6%	510
1	0%	11.7%	88.3%	281
-1	47.1%	51.9%	1.1%	189
2	0%	0%	100%	20

Turn on more demographic options in the form above to add their cuts to this matrix.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band

35-44 — 37.1% (n=170)

45-54 — 46.2% (n=171)

18-24 — 32% (n=125)

65-74 — 66.2% (n=142)

55-64 — 60.5% (n=162)

25-34 — 37.1% (n=151)

75+ — 53.2% (n=79)

Gender

Male — 46.2% (n=476)

Female — 47.9% (n=501)

Non-binary — 38.5% (n=13)

Prefer not to say — 70% (n=10)

Party identification

True Independent / Moderate / Other — 35.7% (n=314)

Strong Republican — 99.4% (n=163)

Independent / Leaning Republican — 68.1% (n=135)

Not-so-strong Democrat — 1.3% (n=80)

Not-so-strong Republican — 89.8% (n=108)

Independent / Leaning Democratic — 9.1% (n=88)

Strong Democrat — 0% (n=112)

Registered voter status

1 — 46.9% (n=879)

0 — 49.6% (n=121)

State

NM — 34.3% (n=35)

NV — 45.8% (n=72)

TN — 60% (n=5)

VT — 38.8% (n=67)

SC — 49% (n=51)

DE — 47.8% (n=23)

PA — 50% (n=36)

NH — 46.9% (n=49)

FL — 40.6% (n=32)

ND — 49.1% (n=53)

AL — 60% (n=5)

WV — 46.7% (n=15)

WY — 44.7% (n=38)

UT — 48.6% (n=72)

LA — 66.7% (n=18)

OR — 46.4% (n=28)

AR — 50% (n=28)

NJ — 41.7% (n=24)

MT — 52.2% (n=23)

MO — 75% (n=8)

RI — 54.4% (n=68)

AZ — 45.7% (n=35)

CT — 46.7% (n=15)

AK — 40% (n=30)

ID — 44.4% (n=9)

ME — 39.3% (n=56)

MA — 57.1% (n=28)

HI — 52.9% (n=17)

SD — 60% (n=5)

DC — 33.3% (n=15)

MS — 50% (n=8)

MD — 60% (n=5)

KS — 77.8% (n=9)

Voting consistency

Only in major Presidential elections — 45.7% (n=188)

Every single election (Primary & General) — 48.7% (n=413)

Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 47.6% (n=286)

Rarely vote — 42.3% (n=78)

First-time participant (Future Voter) — 45.7% (n=35)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance

5 — 48.8% (n=715)

6 — 86% (n=93)

4 — 22.4% (n=192)

Public safety funding stance

4 — 27.2% (n=522)

5 — 76.7% (n=412)

3 — 0% (n=52)

6 — 100% (n=14)

School funding / choice stance

5 — 77.7% (n=368)

6 — 100% (n=43)

4 — 30.2% (n=470)

3 — 0.8% (n=119)

Regulation & business stance

4 — 31.5% (n=428)

6 — 98.5% (n=68)

5 — 82% (n=327)

3 — 1.1% (n=174)

Federal economy stance

4 — 36% (n=495)

5 — 91.1% (n=302)

3 — 3.8% (n=186)

2 — 0% (n=5)

6 — 100% (n=12)

Abortion stance

5 — 62.1% (n=383)

6 — 96.3% (n=189)

4 — 15% (n=294)

3 — 0.8% (n=125)

7 — 100% (n=7)

Property-tax cap debate

1 — 100% (n=366)

0 — 0% (n=407)

2 — 100% (n=106)

-1 — 0% (n=119)

Parental-notification debate

1 — 79.5% (n=317)

2 — 100% (n=73)

0 — 33.7% (n=406)

-1 — 5.7% (n=175)

-2 — 0% (n=29)

Biological sex in sports debate

0 — 36.8% (n=400)

1 — 85.1% (n=295)

-1 — 2.4% (n=207)

2 — 100% (n=69)

-2 — 0% (n=29)

Single-sex spaces debate

0 — 33.8% (n=417)

2 — 98.5% (n=67)

1 — 83.9% (n=310)

-1 — 2.6% (n=189)

-2 — 0% (n=17)

Policing vs. community safety debate

0 — 37.5% (n=437)

1 — 80.2% (n=323)

-1 — 7.6% (n=185)

2 — 97.2% (n=36)

-2 — 0% (n=19)

Senate/SCOTUS reform debate

0 — 39.6% (n=510)

1 — 88.3% (n=281)

-1 — 1.1% (n=189)

2 — 100% (n=20)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.