Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

Re-run with a new sample Download CSV
SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 51.6% — a solid but not commanding lead (14.2 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment) Segment leaderboard (sortable) Geography (state & county) Raw table + CSV export

Geography — states

StatenFor leaderShare of sample
NH73 43.8% 7.3%
UT72 54.2% 7.2%
RI69 52.2% 6.9%
NV67 44.8% 6.7%
ME66 47% 6.6%
VT65 46.2% 6.5%

Geography — counties (top by sample size)

CountynFor leaderShare of sample
Providence County23 47.8%2.3%
Bristol County20 45%2%
Kent County16 75%1.6%
Franklin County16 50%1.6%
Newport County14 57.1%1.4%
District of Columbia14 50%1.4%

Only counties that appear in this sample are listed. Widen the sample size for a fuller map.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band
35-44 — 43.4% (n=145)
25-34 — 39.1% (n=174)
55-64 — 71.7% (n=166)
45-54 — 52.1% (n=169)
75+ — 62.2% (n=98)
18-24 — 33.9% (n=109)
65-74 — 57.6% (n=139)
Gender
Female — 51.3% (n=530)
Prefer not to say — 21.4% (n=14)
Male — 53.1% (n=441)
Non-binary — 46.7% (n=15)
Party identification
Independent / Leaning Republican — 73% (n=122)
Strong Democrat — 0% (n=107)
Not-so-strong Republican — 89% (n=127)
True Independent / Moderate / Other — 40.5% (n=321)
Not-so-strong Democrat — 9.2% (n=76)
Strong Republican — 99.4% (n=171)
Independent / Leaning Democratic — 9.2% (n=76)
Registered voter status
1 — 51.9% (n=886)
0 — 49.1% (n=114)
State
RI — 52.2% (n=69)
ME — 47% (n=66)
NJ — 62.5% (n=24)
NH — 43.8% (n=73)
CT — 57.7% (n=26)
ND — 55.3% (n=47)
WY — 57.9% (n=38)
DE — 62.5% (n=8)
VT — 46.2% (n=65)
NV — 44.8% (n=67)
MA — 47.4% (n=38)
FL — 55.9% (n=34)
SC — 54.8% (n=42)
PA — 42.9% (n=28)
LA — 62.5% (n=8)
AK — 46.7% (n=30)
OR — 51.6% (n=31)
UT — 54.2% (n=72)
MT — 47.4% (n=19)
AL — 66.7% (n=12)
NM — 57.7% (n=26)
AR — 58.3% (n=24)
ID — 66.7% (n=12)
AZ — 46.5% (n=43)
DC — 50% (n=14)
WV — 55.6% (n=18)
MS — 83.3% (n=6)
MD — 16.7% (n=6)
NE — 88.9% (n=9)
HI — 50% (n=18)
OK — 33.3% (n=6)
Voting consistency
Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 49.4% (n=259)
Every single election (Primary & General) — 53.7% (n=451)
Only in major Presidential elections — 54.2% (n=179)
Rarely vote — 44.9% (n=78)
First-time participant (Future Voter) — 42.4% (n=33)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance
5 — 54.8% (n=708)
4 — 21.9% (n=187)
6 — 82.9% (n=105)
Public safety funding stance
5 — 78.1% (n=442)
4 — 30.6% (n=483)
6 — 100% (n=21)
3 — 3.7% (n=54)
School funding / choice stance
5 — 81.3% (n=407)
3 — 1.8% (n=113)
4 — 32.7% (n=441)
6 — 100% (n=39)
Regulation & business stance
5 — 84.9% (n=350)
3 — 4% (n=176)
4 — 36.2% (n=406)
6 — 100% (n=65)
Federal economy stance
4 — 42.8% (n=486)
3 — 5.4% (n=185)
5 — 91% (n=310)
6 — 100% (n=16)
Abortion stance
5 — 64.7% (n=385)
3 — 0.9% (n=111)
4 — 21.4% (n=294)
6 — 98% (n=201)
7 — 100% (n=6)
Property-tax cap debate
1 — 100% (n=410)
-1 — 0% (n=107)
0 — 0% (n=374)
2 — 100% (n=106)
Parental-notification debate
1 — 79.3% (n=333)
-1 — 7% (n=171)
0 — 42.3% (n=397)
2 — 97.3% (n=74)
-2 — 0% (n=25)
Biological sex in sports debate
0 — 40.3% (n=402)
-2 — 0% (n=32)
1 — 86.5% (n=310)
2 — 100% (n=70)
-1 — 8.6% (n=186)
Single-sex spaces debate
1 — 83.6% (n=330)
-1 — 5.2% (n=174)
0 — 39.2% (n=403)
2 — 100% (n=73)
-2 — 0% (n=20)
Policing vs. community safety debate
1 — 84.9% (n=351)
-1 — 8.9% (n=179)
0 — 41% (n=422)
-2 — 0% (n=19)
2 — 100% (n=29)
Senate/SCOTUS reform debate
0 — 43% (n=509)
-1 — 3.1% (n=163)
1 — 89.7% (n=310)
2 — 100% (n=14)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.