Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Pick a question we already ask

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

Or write your own question Your answer options (comma-separated, 2–6)

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Age band

Gender

Education

Household income

Marital status

Household size

K-12 children in household

Housing

Location type

Employment

Voting consistency

Voice tier

Forum engagement

State

County

Party identification (pick one or more)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

Sample size (simulated completes)

Demographic options to show OPTION 1 — Basic Demographics OPTION 2 — Bundle A — Household & Family OPTION 3 — Bundle B — Economic Profile OPTION 4 — Bundle C — Civic Participation OPTION 5 — Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions

Re-run with a new sample Download CSV

SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 51.8% — a solid but not commanding lead (14.2 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment) Segment leaderboard (sortable) Geography (state & county) Raw table + CSV export

Every segment we hold, ranked. Sort it the way you think about the race:

Lead share — highest support for the winning answer first Sample size — biggest segments first Over-performers — furthest above the overall average first Under-performers — furthest below the overall average first Battlegrounds — most evenly split segments first (closest to a tie)

#	Segment	Demographic set	n	For the leader	vs. average
1	Strong Republican	Party identification	159	100%	+48.2 pts
2	Not-so-strong Republican	Party identification	133	91%	+39.2 pts
3	KS	State	7	85.7%	+33.9 pts
4	ID	State	7	85.7%	+33.9 pts
5	Independent / Leaning Republican	Party identification	131	78.6%	+26.8 pts
6	75+	Age band	111	77.5%	+25.7 pts
7	DC	State	7	71.4%	+19.6 pts
8	Retired	Employment	211	67.8%	+16 pts
9	Yes, grandchildren only (not primary dependent children)	K-12 children in household	180	67.2%	+15.4 pts
10	55-64	Age band	164	66.5%	+14.7 pts
11	Debate regular	Forum engagement	120	65.8%	+14 pts
12	65-74	Age band	131	64.9%	+13.1 pts
13	Farmette	Location type	90	64.4%	+12.6 pts
14	Country — no acres	Location type	134	64.2%	+12.4 pts
15	AR	State	30	63.3%	+11.5 pts
16	Own my home (with or without a mortgage)	Housing	622	63%	+11.2 pts
17	Country — 5 to 50 acres	Location type	111	62.2%	+10.4 pts
18	FL	State	26	61.5%	+9.7 pts
19	WV	State	13	61.5%	+9.7 pts
20	Self-employed / Business owner	Employment	102	60.8%	+9 pts
21	UT	State	67	59.7%	+7.9 pts
22	Country — 1 to 5 acres	Location type	129	58.9%	+7.1 pts
23	Divorced / Separated	Marital status	131	58.8%	+7 pts
24	Prefer not to say	Household income	58	58.6%	+6.8 pts
25	Yes, children in Homeschool programs	K-12 children in household	53	58.5%	+6.7 pts
26	LA	State	12	58.3%	+6.5 pts
27	ME	State	55	58.2%	+6.4 pts
28	Homemaker / Caregiver	Employment	68	57.4%	+5.6 pts
29	OK	State	7	57.1%	+5.3 pts
30	CT	State	7	57.1%	+5.3 pts
31	AK	State	21	57.1%	+5.3 pts
32	Under $25,000	Household income	163	57.1%	+5.3 pts
33	Farm	Location type	100	57%	+5.2 pts
34	Non-high school graduate	Education	67	56.7%	+4.9 pts
35	OR	State	39	56.4%	+4.6 pts
36	$75,000-$99,999	Household income	144	56.3%	+4.5 pts
37	premium	Voice tier	284	56%	+4.2 pts
38	4	Household size	136	55.9%	+4.1 pts
39	Regular poster	Forum engagement	313	55.9%	+4.1 pts
40	Some college / Associate degree / Vocational training	Education	309	55.7%	+3.9 pts
41	Prefer not to say	Gender	9	55.6%	+3.8 pts
42	NH	State	56	55.4%	+3.6 pts
43	Only in major Presidential elections	Voting consistency	188	55.3%	+3.5 pts
44	PA	State	31	54.8%	+3 pts
45	Widowed	Marital status	64	54.7%	+2.9 pts
46	Every single election (Primary & General)	Voting consistency	403	54.6%	+2.8 pts
47	6+	Household size	55	54.5%	+2.7 pts
48	Married	Marital status	499	53.7%	+1.9 pts
49	Male	Gender	453	53.6%	+1.8 pts
50	High school graduate / GED	Education	303	53.5%	+1.7 pts
51	1	Registered voter status	880	52.8%	+1 pts
52	Unable to work / Disability	Employment	59	52.5%	+0.7 pts
53	RI	State	63	52.4%	+0.6 pts
54	AZ	State	48	52.1%	+0.3 pts
55	Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential)	Voting consistency	295	51.9%	+0.1 pts
56	3	Household size	158	51.9%	+0.1 pts
57	Female	Gender	513	51.1%	-0.7 pts
58	2	Household size	352	51.1%	-0.7 pts
59	$100,000-$149,999	Household income	135	51.1%	-0.7 pts
60	1	Household size	195	50.8%	-1 pts

Segments under 5 completes are hidden. "Battlegrounds" sorts the segments closest to a 50/50 tie — that is where message testing earns its money.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band

65-74 — 64.9% (n=131)

18-24 — 34.5% (n=113)

45-54 — 43.3% (n=164)

55-64 — 66.5% (n=164)

75+ — 77.5% (n=111)

25-34 — 39.4% (n=180)

35-44 — 41.6% (n=137)

Gender

Female — 51.1% (n=513)

Male — 53.6% (n=453)

Non-binary — 32% (n=25)

Prefer not to say — 55.6% (n=9)

Party identification

Strong Republican — 100% (n=159)

Independent / Leaning Republican — 78.6% (n=131)

Strong Democrat — 0% (n=109)

Independent / Leaning Democratic — 12.9% (n=85)

True Independent / Moderate / Other — 39.9% (n=306)

Not-so-strong Republican — 91% (n=133)

Not-so-strong Democrat — 2.6% (n=77)

Registered voter status

1 — 52.8% (n=880)

0 — 44.2% (n=120)

State

ME — 58.2% (n=55)

PA — 54.8% (n=31)

NH — 55.4% (n=56)

FL — 61.5% (n=26)

RI — 52.4% (n=63)

WY — 50% (n=44)

SC — 45.3% (n=53)

UT — 59.7% (n=67)

NE — 41.7% (n=12)

VT — 48.8% (n=80)

LA — 58.3% (n=12)

AL — 20% (n=5)

DE — 40.9% (n=22)

MA — 45% (n=40)

NM — 43.3% (n=30)

MT — 36.8% (n=19)

ND — 40.4% (n=57)

OK — 57.1% (n=7)

AZ — 52.1% (n=48)

AR — 63.3% (n=30)

HI — 45.8% (n=24)

NV — 48.3% (n=60)

CT — 57.1% (n=7)

WV — 61.5% (n=13)

NJ — 50% (n=24)

KS — 85.7% (n=7)

OR — 56.4% (n=39)

MS — 50% (n=14)

AK — 57.1% (n=21)

ID — 85.7% (n=7)

DC — 71.4% (n=7)

TN — 20% (n=5)

Voting consistency

Every single election (Primary & General) — 54.6% (n=403)

Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 51.9% (n=295)

Only in major Presidential elections — 55.3% (n=188)

First-time participant (Future Voter) — 43.3% (n=30)

Rarely vote — 33.3% (n=84)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance

5 — 55.3% (n=702)

6 — 94.3% (n=88)

4 — 22.4% (n=210)

Public safety funding stance

5 — 79.4% (n=446)

4 — 31.2% (n=468)

6 — 100% (n=17)

3 — 1.4% (n=69)

School funding / choice stance

5 — 81.4% (n=387)

4 — 33.5% (n=451)

3 — 2.7% (n=113)

6 — 100% (n=49)

Regulation & business stance

5 — 86.6% (n=359)

3 — 1.5% (n=196)

4 — 37.9% (n=383)

6 — 100% (n=59)

Federal economy stance

5 — 90.4% (n=301)

4 — 45.5% (n=492)

3 — 4.2% (n=191)

6 — 100% (n=14)

Abortion stance

6 — 97.5% (n=202)

4 — 20.1% (n=284)

3 — 0% (n=121)

5 — 66.6% (n=383)

7 — 100% (n=9)

Property-tax cap debate

2 — 100% (n=98)

0 — 0% (n=376)

1 — 100% (n=420)

-1 — 0% (n=104)

Parental-notification debate

1 — 81.7% (n=323)

0 — 41.6% (n=389)

-2 — 0% (n=30)

-1 — 6.3% (n=175)

2 — 97.6% (n=83)

Biological sex in sports debate

2 — 100% (n=84)

0 — 41.9% (n=382)

1 — 88% (n=300)

-1 — 5.2% (n=194)

-2 — 0% (n=40)

Single-sex spaces debate

1 — 89.6% (n=327)

0 — 37.4% (n=396)

-1 — 3.2% (n=187)

2 — 100% (n=71)

-2 — 0% (n=19)

Policing vs. community safety debate

1 — 87.5% (n=351)

0 — 41.6% (n=413)

-1 — 4.7% (n=191)

-2 — 0% (n=15)

2 — 100% (n=30)

Senate/SCOTUS reform debate

1 — 92% (n=314)

0 — 42.2% (n=493)

-1 — 3.4% (n=178)

2 — 100% (n=15)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.