Test a Poll on 10,000 Simulated Voters PRIVATE DEMO

Poll the network, cut it by every demographic we hold, and watch the numbers move like a real sample — in seconds, with no fielding cost. These voters are simulated; every question and every demographic below is drawn from the questions we really ask our members.

SIMULATED PANEL — 10,000 generated pseudo-voters across 41 states / 359 counties. Nothing on this page is real member data. Do not publish these numbers as findings.

1 · The question

Every one of these is either on register_step2.php or in the party forums, so the simulated answers sit on the exact wording your members see.

A written question is answered from each voter's positions, ideology and demographics — so re-cutting the audience changes the result.

2 · The audience (these are the fields our signup form collects)

Ctrl/Cmd-click to select several (mobile: tap the ones you want).

Re-run with a new sample Download CSV
SIMULATED RESULT — 1,000 simulated completes from 10,000 matching pseudo-voters. Margin of error ±4.4%. Not a real poll.

Would you support capping county property tax increases if it meant cutting specific local government services?

Audience: All simulated voters · Question source: From our party forums (the debate threads)

Agree leads with 48.1% — a solid but not commanding lead (8.7 pts over Undecided / Depends on details).

Bar chart + AI narrative Cross-tab matrix (answer × segment) Segment leaderboard (sortable) Geography (state & county) Raw table + CSV export
AnswerCountShare
Disagree125 12.5%
Undecided / Depends on details394 39.4%
Agree481 48.1%
Total1,000100%

Download this result set as CSV

The CSV carries the headline plus every segment cut you have switched on — the file a pollster would hand to a candidate.

Demographic cuts the 5 options

Each option is a bundle of demographic cuts. Option 1 is always included; the rest are the bundles you define. Every cut below is computed from the same simulated response set.

OPTION 1 · Basic Demographics on

Included with every poll. The six cuts every campaign needs on day one.

Age band
45-54 — 43.7% (n=174)
18-24 — 29.8% (n=104)
25-34 — 32.2% (n=183)
55-64 — 65.5% (n=168)
65-74 — 66.4% (n=131)
35-44 — 37.7% (n=151)
75+ — 68.5% (n=89)
Gender
Female — 48.6% (n=492)
Male — 47.9% (n=484)
Non-binary — 41.7% (n=12)
Prefer not to say — 41.7% (n=12)
Party identification
True Independent / Moderate / Other — 38.5% (n=301)
Strong Republican — 99.4% (n=168)
Not-so-strong Democrat — 3.2% (n=94)
Independent / Leaning Republican — 69.4% (n=108)
Independent / Leaning Democratic — 8.1% (n=99)
Strong Democrat — 0% (n=111)
Not-so-strong Republican — 94.1% (n=119)
Registered voter status
1 — 48.9% (n=893)
0 — 41.1% (n=107)
State
DE — 36.4% (n=22)
NV — 48% (n=75)
NH — 42.2% (n=64)
RI — 57.1% (n=56)
MA — 65% (n=40)
NJ — 53.6% (n=28)
ND — 57.4% (n=54)
SC — 48% (n=50)
UT — 37.5% (n=56)
AZ — 52.3% (n=44)
OK — 20% (n=5)
CT — 38.9% (n=18)
AR — 32.3% (n=31)
WY — 47.4% (n=38)
NM — 56% (n=25)
MT — 54.5% (n=22)
NE — 33.3% (n=18)
HI — 52.4% (n=21)
VT — 43.1% (n=65)
OR — 51.5% (n=33)
PA — 43.3% (n=30)
MS — 50% (n=6)
FL — 47.4% (n=38)
ME — 46.9% (n=49)
DC — 58.3% (n=12)
ID — 40% (n=10)
WV — 35.3% (n=17)
KS — 54.5% (n=11)
AK — 52.4% (n=21)
LA — 88.9% (n=9)
MI — 60% (n=5)
TN — 50% (n=8)
AL — 40% (n=5)
Voting consistency
Only in major Presidential elections — 41.3% (n=179)
Every single election (Primary & General) — 54.3% (n=438)
Rarely vote — 37.7% (n=77)
Almost every election (Major midterms & presidential) — 46.4% (n=276)
First-time participant (Future Voter) — 40% (n=30)

OPTION 2 · Bundle A — Household & Family switched off

Who is actually at the kitchen table: marital status, household size, children, housing, density.

Switch this option on

OPTION 3 · Bundle B — Economic Profile switched off

Pocketbook voters: education, employment situation, household income.

Switch this option on

OPTION 4 · Bundle C — Civic Participation switched off

Will they actually show up (and do they talk about it): voting consistency, voice tier, forum engagement.

Switch this option on

OPTION 5 · Bundle D — Issue & Debate Positions on

What they already told us on the signup questionnaire and in the party forums — the deepest cut we hold.

Infrastructure & roads stance
4 — 25% (n=200)
5 — 49.9% (n=720)
6 — 90% (n=80)
Public safety funding stance
5 — 76.9% (n=432)
4 — 27.4% (n=485)
3 — 0% (n=67)
6 — 100% (n=16)
School funding / choice stance
4 — 31.5% (n=441)
6 — 100% (n=47)
5 — 78.5% (n=372)
3 — 2.1% (n=140)
Regulation & business stance
4 — 32.7% (n=397)
5 — 87.7% (n=333)
3 — 1.4% (n=212)
6 — 100% (n=56)
Federal economy stance
4 — 39.2% (n=462)
5 — 91.9% (n=310)
3 — 2.8% (n=213)
6 — 100% (n=9)
2 — 0% (n=6)
Abortion stance
4 — 18.9% (n=312)
6 — 98.5% (n=204)
3 — 0.8% (n=124)
5 — 61.4% (n=350)
7 — 100% (n=5)
2 — 0% (n=5)
Property-tax cap debate
0 — 0% (n=394)
1 — 100% (n=374)
2 — 100% (n=107)
-1 — 0% (n=124)
Parental-notification debate
0 — 37.6% (n=372)
2 — 97.5% (n=79)
-1 — 5.9% (n=203)
1 — 78.3% (n=322)
-2 — 0% (n=24)
Biological sex in sports debate
-1 — 3.2% (n=216)
1 — 89.1% (n=293)
0 — 36.7% (n=384)
-2 — 0% (n=35)
2 — 100% (n=72)
Single-sex spaces debate
0 — 33% (n=388)
1 — 86.2% (n=319)
-1 — 1% (n=201)
2 — 100% (n=76)
-2 — 0% (n=16)
Policing vs. community safety debate
0 — 36.1% (n=451)
1 — 87.7% (n=318)
-1 — 5.7% (n=193)
-2 — 0% (n=10)
2 — 100% (n=28)
Senate/SCOTUS reform debate
0 — 39.6% (n=508)
1 — 89.5% (n=286)
-1 — 3.2% (n=185)
2 — 100% (n=18)

This is the demo. The workspace is where you work.

The demo runs one poll at a time. In the pollster workspace you write and save your own polls, keep an audience template per race, re-run them as opinion moves, and compare runs side by side.

Open the pollster workspace →

Private demo · token-gated · noindex · not linked publicly. Panel seeded from the same fields our members complete at register_step2.php.